He descended into hell
III.
Now
followeth the third and last degree of ChristÕs humiliation: He descended
into hell. It seems very likely that
these words were not placed in the Creed at the first, or (as some think) that
they crept in by negligence, because above threescore creeds of the most
ancient councils and fathers want this clause; and among the rest, the Nicene
Creed. But if the ancient and learned fathers assembled in that council had
been persuaded, or at least had imagined that these words had been set down at
the first by the apostles, no doubt they would not in any wise have left them
out. And an ancient writer saith directly that these words, He descended
into hell, are not found in the creed
of the Roman church, nor used in the churches of the East, and if they be, that
then they signify the burial of Christ. And it must not seem strange to any
that a word or twain in process of time should creep into the Creed,
considering that the original copies of the books of the Old and New Testament have
in them sundry varieties of readings and words otherwhiles, which from the
margin have crept into the text. Nevertheless considering that this clause hath
long continued in the Creed, and that by common consent of the catholic church
of God, and it may carry a fit sense and exposition; it is not as some would
have it to be put forth.
Therefore
that we may come to speak of the meaning of it; we must know that it hath some
usual expositions, which we will rehearse in order and then make choice of that
which shall be thought the fittest.
1.
The
first is that ChristÕs soul after the passion upon the cross, did really and
locally descend into the place of the damned. But this seems not to be true.
The reasons are these:
(1)
All the evangelists, and among the rest St Luke, intending to make an exact
narration (Luke 1:3) of the life and death of Christ, hath set down at large
His passion, death, burial, resurrection and ascension, and withal they make
rehearsal of small circumstances, therefore no doubt they would not have
omitted ChristÕs local descent into the place of the damned, if there had been
any such thing. And the end why they penned this history was that we might
believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God; and believing, we might have life
everlasting (John 20:31). Now there could not have been a greater matter for
the confirmation of our faith than this: that Jesus the son of Mary who went
down to the place of the damned, returned thence to live in happiness for ever.
(2)
If Christ did go into the place of the damned, then either in soul or in body
or in Godhead. But His Godhead could not descend, because it is everywhere, and
His body was in the grave. And as for His soul it went not to hell, but
presently after His death it went to Paradise, that is, the third heaven, a
place of joy and happiness (Luke 23:43), This day thou shalt be with me in
Paradise; which words of Christ must
be understood of His manhood or soul, and not of His Godhead. For they are an
answer to a demand; and therefore unto it they must be suitable. Now the thief
seeing that Christ was first of all crucified, and therefore in all likelihood
should first of all die, makes his request to this effect: Lord, thou shalt
shortly enter into thy kingdom, remember me then; to which ChristÕs answer (as the very words import)
is thus much: I shall enter into Paradise this day, and there shalt thou be
with me. Now there is no entrance but
in regard of His soul or manhood. For the Godhead which is at all times in all
places, cannot be said properly to enter into a place. Again, when Christ
saith, Thou shalt be with me in Paradise, He doth intimate a resemblance which is between the first and second
Adam. The first Adam sinned against God, and was presently cast forth out of
Paradise; Christ the second Adam, having made a satisfaction for sin, must
immediately enter into Paradise. Now to say that Christ in soul descended
locally into hell, is to abolish this analogy between the first and second
Adam.
(3)
Ancient councils in their confessions and creeds omitting this clause, shew
that they did not acknowledge any real descent, and that the true meaning of
those words, He descended, was
sufficiently included in some of the former articles, And that may appear
because when they set down it, they omit some of the former; as Athanasius in
his creed setting down those words, He descended etc., omits the burial, putting them both for one as
he expounds himself elsewhere. Now let us see the reasons which may be alleged
to the contrary:
Objection
1. (Matt. 12:40) The Son of man
shall be three days and three nights in the earth, that is, hell.
Answer
1. This exposition is directly
against the scope of the place; for the Pharisees desired to see a sign, that
is, some sensible and manifest miracle; and hereunto Christ answers that He
will give them the sign of Jonah, which cannot be the descent of His soul into
the place of the damned, because it was insensible; but rather His burial, and
after it His manifest and glorious resurrection.
Answer
2. The heart of the earth may as well
signify the grave, as the centre of the earth. For thus Tyre bordering upon the
sea is said to be in the heart of the sea (Ezek. 27:4).
Answer
3. This exposition takes it for
granted that hell is seated in the midst of the earth; whereas the Scriptures
reveal unto us no more but this: that hell is in the lower parts; but where
these lower parts should be, no man is able to define.
Objection
2. (Acts 2:27) Thou wilt not leave
my soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thy holy one to see corruption.
Answer. These words cannot prove any local descent of
ChristÕs soul. For PeterÕs drift in alleging of them is to prove the
resurrection, and he saith expressly that the words must be understood of the
resurrection of Christ (v.31), He seeing this before, spake of the
resurrection of Christ. What? Namely
these words: His soul was not left in hell etc. Now there is no resurrection of the soul, but of the body only,
as the soul cannot be said to fall, but the body. It will be replied that the word
quchn
cannot signify the body and
the word adou the grave. Answer: The first word signifies not only the
spiritual part of man, the soul; but also the whole person, or the man himself
(Rom. 13:1; 1 Cor. 15:40). And the second is as well taken for the grave as for
hell (Rev. 20:14) Death and adou are cast into the lake of fire, Now we cannot say that hell is cast into
hell, but the grave into hell. And the very same word in this text must needs
have this sense. For Peter makes an opposition between the grave into which
David is shut up and the hell out of which Christ was delivered (vv. 29,31).
Again, it will be said that in this text there be two distinct parts: the first
of the souls coming forth of hell, in these words: Thou wilt not leave my
soul in hell; the second,
of the bodies rising out of the grave in the next words: Neither wilt thou
suffer my flesh to see corruption. Answer:
It is not so, for flesh in this place signifies not the body alone but the
human nature of Christ, as appears in v.30, unless we shall say that one and
the same word in the same sentence is taken two ways. And the words rather
carry this sense: Thou wilt not suffer me to continue long in the grave; nay,
which is more, in my time of continuance there, thou wilt not suffer me so much
as to feel any corruption, because I am thy holy one.
Objection 3.
(1 Pet. 3:18,19) Christ was quickened in spirit, by the which spirit He went
and preached to the spirits which are in prison.
Answer.
The place is not for this purpose. For by spirit is not meant the soul of Christ, but His
Godhead, which in the ministry of Noah preached repentance to the old world.
And I think that Peter in this place alludes to another place in Genesis 6:3,
where the Lord saith, My Spirit shall not always strive with man, because he
is but flesh. And if the
spirit doth signify the soul, then Christ was quickened either by His soul, or
in His soul. But neither is true. For the first, it cannot be said that Christ
was quickened by His soul, because it did not join itself to the body; but the
Godhead joined them both. Neither was He quickened in soul; for His soul died
not. It could not die the first death, which belongs to the body; and it did
not die the second death, which is a total separation from God; only it
suffered the sorrows of the second death, which is the apprehension of the
wrath of God; as a man may feel the pangs of the first death, and yet not die
the first death, but live. Again, it is to no end that ChristÕs soul should go
to hell to preach, considering that it was never heard of that one soul should
preach to another, especially in hell, where all are condemned and in
conscience convicted of their just damnation, and where there is no hope of
repentance or redemption. It will be answered that this preaching is only real
or experimental, because Christ shews Himself there to convince the unbelief of
His enemies; but this is flat against reason. For when a man is justly
condemned by God, and therefore sufficiently convicted, what needs the judge himself
come to the place of execution to convict him? And it is flat against the text;
for the preaching that is spoken of here is that which is performed by men in
the ministry of the Word, as Peter expounds himself (1 Pet. 4:6), To this
purpose was the gospel also preached unto the dead, that they might be
condemned according to men in the flesh, that they might live according to God
in the Spirit. Lastly,
there is no reason why Christ should rather preach and shew Himself in hell, to
them that were disobedient in the days of Noah, than to the rest of the damned.
2.
And this is the first exposition, the second follows: He
descended into hell, that
is, Christ descended into the grave, or was buried. This exposition is
agreeable to the truth, yet it is not meet or convenient. For the clause next
before, He was buried,
contained this point; and therefore if the next words following yield the same
sense, there must be a vain and needless repetition of one and the same thing
twice, which is not in any wise to be allowed in so short a creed as this. If
it be said that these words are an exposition of the former, the answer is that
then they should be more plain than the former. For when one sentence
expoundeth another, the latter must always be the plainer; but of these two
sentences, He was buried, He descended into hell, the first is very plain and easy, but
the latter very obscure and hard, and therefore it can be no exposition
thereof; and for this cause this exposition neither is to be received.
3.
Thirdly, others there be which expound it thus: He descended
into hell, that is,
Christ Jesus, when he was dying upon the cross, felt and suffered the pangs of
hell and the full wrath of God seizing upon His soul. This exposition hath his
warrant in GodÕs Word, where hell often signifies the sorrows and pains of
hell, as Hannah in her song unto the Lord (1 Sam. 2:6) saith, The Lord
killeth and maketh alive, He bringeth down to hell and raiseth up, that is, He makes men feel woe and
misery in their souls, even the pangs of hell, and after restoreth them. And
David saith (Psa. 18:5), The sorrows of death compassed me, and the sorrows
of hell laid hold on me.
This is an usual exposition received of the church, and they which expound this
article thus, give this reason thereof. The former words, was crucified,
dead and buried, do
contain (say they) the outward sufferings of Christ. Now, because He suffered
not only outwardly in body, but also inwardly in soul, therefore these words He
descended into hell, do
set forth unto us His inward sufferings in soul, when He felt upon the cross
the full wrath of God upon Him. This exposition is good and true, and whosoever
will may receive it. Yet nevertheless it seems not so fitly to agree with the
order of the former articles. For these words, was crucified, dead and
buried, must not be
understood of any ordinary death, but of a cursed death, in which Christ
suffered the full wrath of God, even the pangs of hell both in soul and body.
Seeing then this exposition is contained in the former words, it cannot fitly
stand with the order of this short creed, unless there should be a distinct
article of things repeated before.
4.
But let us come to the fourth exposition, He descended into
hell, that is, when He
was dead and buried, He was held captive in the grave, and lay in bondage under
death for the space of three days. This exposition also may be gathered forth
of the Scriptures. St Peter saith (Acts 2:24), God hath raised Him up (speaking of Christ) and loosed the
sorrows of death, because it was impossible that He should be holden of it. Where we may see that between the death
and resurrection of Christ, there is placed a third matter, which is not
mentioned in any clause of the ApostlesÕ Creed, save in this; and that is His
bondage under death, which cometh inbetween His death and rising again. And the
words themselves do most fitly bear this sense, as the speech of Jacob sheweth
(Gen. 37:35), I will go down into hell (or the grave) unto my son mourning. And this exposition doth also best agree
with the order of the Creed: first, He was crucified and died; secondly, he was
buried; thirdly, laid in the grave, and was therein held in captivity and
bondage under death. And these three degrees of ChristÕs humiliation, are most
fitly correspondent to the three degrees of His exaltation: He rose again
the third day, answering
to the first degree of His humiliation, He died; the second degree of His exaltation, He
ascended into heaven,
answering to going down into the grave, was buried; and thirdly, His sitting at the right
hand of God (which is the
highest degree of His exaltation) answering to the lowest degree of
humiliation, He descended into hell. These two last expositions are commonly received, and we may
indifferently make choice of either, but the last (as I take it) is most
agreeable to the order and words of the Creed.
Thus much for the meaning of the words; now follow the uses:
1. And first of all, ChristÕs descending into hell teacheth that
every one of us that professeth the name of Christ, that if it shall please God
to afflict us, either in body or in mind or in both, though it be most grievous
and tedious manner, yet must we not think it strange. For if Christ upon the
cross not only suffered the pangs of hell, but after He was dead, death takes
Him and as it were carries Him into his den or cabin, and there triumpheth over
Him, holding Him in captivity and bondage, and yet for all this was He the son
of God; and therefore when GodÕs hand is heavy upon us any way, we are not to despair,
but rather think it is the good pleasure of God to frame and fashion us that we
may become like unto Christ Jesus as good children of God. David, a man after
GodÕs own heart, was by Samuel anointed king over Israel, but withal God raised
up Saul to persecute him, as the fowler hunteth the partridge in the mountains,
in so much as David said there was but one step between him and death. So
likewise Job (Job 2:8,9), a just man and one that feared God with all his
heart, yet how heavily did God lay His hand upon him? His goods and cattle were
all taken away, and his children slain, and his body stricken by Satan with
loathsome boils from the sole of his foot to the crown of his head, so as he
was fain to take a potsherd and scrape himself sitting among the ashes. And
Jonah, the servant and prophet of the most high God, when he was called to
preach to Nineveh, because he refused for fear of that great city, God met with
him, and he must be cast into the sea and there be swallowed up of a whale,
that so He might chastise him. And thus doth He deal with His own servants, to
make them conformable to Christ. And further, when it pleaseth God to lay His
hands upon our souls, and make us have a troubled and distressed conscience, so
as we do as it were struggle with GodÕs wrath as for life and death, and can
find nothing but His indignation seizing upon our souls, which is the most
grievous and perplexed estate that any man can be in; in this case howsoever we
cannot discern or see any hope or comfort in ourselves, we must not think it
strange, nor quite despair of His mercy. For the son of God Himself descended
into hell, and death carried Him captive, and triumphed over Him in the grave;
and therefore though God seem to be our utter enemy, yet we must not despair of
His help. In divers psalms we read how David was not only persecuted outwardly
of his enemies, but even his soul and conscience were perplexed for his sins,
so as (Psa. 32:3,4) his very bones were consumed within him, and his
moisture was turned into the drought in summer. This caused Job to cry out (Job 6:3,4)
that the arrows of God were within him, and the venom thereof did drink up
his spirit, the terrors of God did fight against him, and the grief of his soul
was as weighty as the sand of the sea, by reason whereof he saith that the Lord did make him a mark
and a butt to shoot at;
and therefore when God shall thus afflict us, either in body or in soul or in
both, we must not always think that it is the wrathful hand of the Lord that
begins to bring us to utter condemnation for our sins, but rather His fatherly
work to kill sin in us and to make us grow in humility, that so we may become
like unto Christ Jesus.
2. Secondly, whereas Christ for our sakes was thus abased, even
unto the lowest degree of humiliation that can be, it is as an example for us
to imitate, as Christ Himself prescribeth (Matt. 11:29), Learn of me, that I
am meek and lowly. And
that we may the better do this, we must learn to become nothing in ourselves,
that we may be all in all forth of ourselves in Christ; we must loath and think
as basely of ourselves as possibly may be in regard of our sins, Christ Jesus
upon the cross was content for our sake to become a worm and no man, as David saith (Psa. 22:6); which did
chiefly appear in this lowest degree of His humiliation, when as death did as
it were tread on Him in his den; and the same mind must likewise be in us which
was in Him. The liking that we have of ourselves must be mere nothing, but all
our love and liking must be forth of ourselves in the death and blood of
Christ.
And thus much of this clause, as also of the state of ChristÕs
humiliation.